Quality of life and psychiatric distress in people with serious mental illness, the role of personal recovery

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWhen considering the personal recovery of people with serious mental illness (SMI), it is essential to examine their reported psychiatric distress and quality of life (QoL). However, there is no consolidated model in the literature that clearly relates these variables. In this study we first analysed the relationships between QoL, psychiatric distress and recovery, and several sociodemographic variables. Second, we analysed the linear effects of psychiatric distress and recovery on QoL. Third, and most important, we tested two hypotheses that considered personal recovery as a moderator or mediator of the relationship between psychiatric distress and QoL.Design and Methods234 volunteers with a diagnosis of SMI completed three self‐report questionnaires, The Recovery Assessment Scale‐24, The World Health Organization QoL and the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation‐Outcome Measure, which showed very good levels of validity and reliability. The PROCESS macro for SPSS developed by Hayes (Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach, The Guilford Press, 2022) was applied using the Bootstrap method to verify our moderation and mediation hypotheses.ResultsWe found a negative linear effect of psychiatric distress on QoL, as well as a positive effect of recovery on said variable. Our results do not confirm the moderating effect of recovery on the relationship between distress and QoL. However, we do confirm the second hypothesis; recovery functioned as a mediating variable between psychiatric distress and QoL.ConclusionsThese findings allow us to reflect on how personal recovery affect the relationship between psychiatric distress and QoL and discuss its theoretical and practical implications as public policies.