Author:
Ding Xin,Wardell Don,Verma Rohit
Abstract
ABSTRACTWe compare three control charts for monitoring data from student evaluations of teaching (SET) with the goal of improving student satisfaction with teaching performance. The two charts that we propose are a modified p chart and a z‐score chart. We show that these charts overcome some of the shortcomings of the more traditional charts for analyzing SET data. A comparison of three charts (an individuals chart, the modified p chart, and the z‐score chart) reveals that the modified p chart is the best approach for analyzing SET data because it utilizes distributions that are appropriate for categorical data, and its interpretation is more straightforward. We conclude that administrators and faculty alike can benefit by using the modified p chart to monitor and improve teaching performance as measured by student evaluations.
Reference28 articles.
1. TOWARD TEACHING EXCELLENCE IN THE DECISION SCIENCES*
2. Increasing the Effectiveness of Student Evaluation of Instructor Data through a Factor Score Comparative Report
3. Cashin W.(1995).Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited. Idea Paper No. 32 Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development Division of Continuing Education Kansas State University .
4. Measure process capability when C
p
won't work;Davis B.;Quality,1995
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献