Post‐operative nursing activities to prevent wound complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries: A scoping review

Author:

Tobiano Georgia12ORCID,Chaboyer Wendy13,Tong Mavis Ying Ting4,Eskes Anne M.3567,Musters Selma C. W.56ORCID,Colquhoun Janelle1,Herbert Georgina2,Gillespie Brigid M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Parklands Queensland Australia

2. Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Health Gold Coast Queensland Australia

3. School of Nursing and Midwifery Griffith University Parklands Queensland Australia

4. School of Nursing and Health Studies The Metropolitan University of Hong Kong Kowloon Hong Kong

5. Department of Surgery Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

6. Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

7. Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo identify postoperative interventions and quality improvement initiatives used to prevent wound complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries, the types of activities nurses undertake in these interventions/initiatives and how these activities align with nurses' scope of practice.DesignA scoping review.Data SourcesThree health databases were searched, and backward and forward citation searching occurred in April 2022. Research and quality improvement initiatives included focussed on adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery, from 2010 onwards. Data were extracted about study characteristics, nursing activities and outcomes. The ‘Dimensions of the scope of nursing practice’ framework was used to classify nursing activities and then the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework was used to synthesise the review findings.ResultsThirty‐seven studies were included. These studies often reported negative wound pressure therapy and surgical site infection bundle interventions/initiatives. Nurses' scope of practice was most frequently ‘Technical procedure and delegated medical care’ meaning nurses frequently acted under doctors' orders, with the most common delegated activity being dressing removal.ConclusionThe full extent of possible interventions nurses could undertake independently in the postoperative period requires further exploration to improve wound outcomes and capitalise on nurses' professional role.Impact Statement Nurses' role in preventing postoperative wound complications is unclear, which may inhibit their ability to influence postoperative outcomes. In the postoperative period, nurses undertake technical activities, under doctors' orders to prevent wound infections. For practice, nurses need to upkeep and audit their technical skills. New avenues for researchers include exploration of independent activities for postoperative nurses and the outcomes of these activities. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThere may be opportunities to broaden nurses' scope of practice to act more autonomously to prevent wound complication.Reporting MethodScoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) checklist.Patient or Public ContributionA health consumer interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3