Affiliation:
1. School of Chemical and Process Engineering University of Leeds Leeds UK
2. Department of Mineralogy and Petrology University of Granada Granada UK
3. School of Chemistry University of Leeds Leeds UK
Abstract
AbstractWe present a comparison of common electron microscopy sample preparation methods for studying crystallisation processes from solution using both scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM). We focus on two widely studied inorganic systems: calcium sulphate, gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3). We find significant differences in crystallisation kinetics and polymorph selection between the different sample preparation methods, which indicate that drying and chemical quenching can induce severe artefacts that are capable of masking the true native state of the crystallising solution. Overall, these results highlight the importance of cryogenic (cryo)‐quenching crystallising solutions and the use of full cryo‐TEM as the most reliable method for studying the early stages of crystallisation.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
University Of Leeds
Wellcome
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献