Emergency department staff experiences of the Bröset Violence Checklist

Author:

Ilarda Elisa1ORCID,McIlveen Peter1ORCID,Tynan Anna23ORCID,Senz Ainslie4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Education University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba Queensland Australia

2. Centre for Health Research University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba Queensland Australia

3. Research Support Unit Darling Downs Health Toowoomba Queensland Australia

4. Department of Emergency Medicine Footscray Hospital, Western Health Footscray Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimWork‐related violence is a significant problem in healthcare settings and emergency departments are one of the highest at‐risk locations. There have been significant challenges in identifying successful risk‐mitigation strategies to reduce the incidence and impact of work‐related violence in this setting. This research explores the perspectives of clinical staff who routinely use violence risk assessment to provide recommendations for improvements.DesignThis qualitative research used interviews of staff who routinely use of the Bröset Violence Checklist in an emergency department. The study was conducted in April 2022.MethodInterview transcripts were subjected to Thematic Analysis to explore participants' clinical experiences and judgements about the utility of the Bröset Violence Checklist.ResultsEleven staff participated in semi‐structured interviews. Participants described themes about the benefits of routine violence risk assessment and the influence of the subjective opinion of the scorer with respect to the emergency department patient cohort. Four categories of violence risk factors were identified: historical, clinical, behavioural and situational. Situational risks were considered important for tailoring the tool for context‐specificity. Limitations of the BVC were identified, with recommendations for context‐specific indicators.ConclusionRoutine violence risk assessment using the Bröset Violence Checklist was deemed useful for emergency departments, however, it has limitations.ImpactThis study's findings offer potential solutions to reduce violence affecting front‐line workers and practical processes that organizations can apply to increase staff safety.ImplicationsThe findings produced recommendations for future research and development to enhance utility of the Bröset Violence Checklist.Reporting MethodEQUATOR guidelines were adhered to and COREQ was used.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution was involved in this study.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3