Comparability of input parameters in the German Retina.net ROP registry and the EU‐ROP registry – An exemplary comparison between 2011 and 2021

Author:

Winter K.1,Pfeil J. M.1ORCID,Engmann H.1,Aisenbrey S.2,Lorenz B.3,Hufendiek K.4,Breuss H.5,Khattab M.6,Süsskind D.7,Kakkassery V.8,Lagrèze W. A.9ORCID,Barth T.10,Liegl R.11ORCID,Bründer M. C.1,Skevas C.12,Goldammer I.13,Glitz B.14,Michalewicz E.15,Krohne T. U.16ORCID,Bartmann I. R.17,Stahl A.1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany

2. Department of Ophthalmology Vivantes Klinikum Neukoelln Berlin Germany

3. Department of Ophthalmology University Medicine Giessen and Marburg GmbH Giessen Campus Giessen Germany

4. University Eye Hospital Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany

5. Department of Ophthalmology HELIOS Klinikum Berlin‐Buch Berlin Germany

6. Department of Ophthalmology University Medical Center Goettingen Goettingen Germany

7. University Eye Hospital Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany

8. Department of Ophthalmology University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany

9. Eye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

10. Department of Ophthalmology University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

11. Department of Ophthalmology University Medicine Bonn Bonn Germany

12. Department of Ophthalmology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

13. Department of Ophthalmology Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH Chemnitz Germany

14. Department of Ophthalmology University of Muenster Medical Center Muenster Germany

15. Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany

16. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany

17. Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum Fulda, Faculty of Medicine/Campus Fulda University of Marburg Fulda Germany

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe German Retina.net ROP registry and its Europe‐wide successor, the EU‐ROP registry, collect data from patients treated for ROP. This analysis compares input parameters of these two registries to establish a procedure for joint analyses of different registry data using exemplary datasets from the two registries.MethodsExemplary datasets from the two databases over a 1‐year period each (German Retina.net ROP Registry, 2011, 22 infants; EU‐ROP Registry, 2021, 44 infants) were compared. The parameters documented in the two databases were aligned and analysed regarding demographic parameters, treatment modalities, complications within first 24 h and retreatments.ResultsThe current analysis showed that data can be aligned for joint analyses with some adjustments within the data structure. The registry with more detailed data collection (EU‐ROP) needs to be reduced regarding granularity in order to align the different registries, as the registry with lower granularity determines the level of analyses that can be performed in a comparative approach. In the exemplary datasets, we observed that the overall most common ROP severity in both registries was zone II, 3+ (2011: 70.5%; 2021: 65%), with decreasing numbers of clock hours showing preretinal neovascularisations (2011: 10–12 clock hours in 29% of cases, 2021: 4–6 clock hours in 38%). The most prevalent treatment method was laser coagulation in 2011 (75%) and anti‐VEGF therapy in 2021 (86.1%). Within the anti‐VEGF group, all patients were treated with bevacizumab in 2011 and with ranibizumab in 2021. Retreatment rates were comparable in 2011 and 2021.ConclusionData from two different ROP registries can be aligned and jointly analysed. The analysis reveals a paradigm shift in treatment modalities, from predominantly laser to anti‐VEGF, and within the anti‐VEGF group from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in Germany. In addition, there was a trend towards earlier treatment in 2021.

Funder

Bayer

Novartis

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3