Advancing the Use of Suction Lysimeters to Inform Soil Leaching and Remediation of PFAS Source Zones

Author:

Rayner John L.,Lee Amanda,Corish Stephen,Leake Simon,Bekele Elise,Davis Greg B.

Abstract

AbstractPorewater in soil vadose zones is an integrator of the fundamental processes governing the transport and partitioning of per and poly‐fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as they move from source zones to groundwater. Suction lysimeters are being advanced as a method to provide reliable and representative PFAS porewater samples, to inform PFAS leaching and for monitoring remedial approaches. We report outcomes of lysimeter investigations across 3 sites and 18 lysimeters within fine‐textured soil profiles. Soil cores were recovered from the same locations, and PFAS concentrations in soils and lysimeter porewater were compared and compared with prior laboratory investigations. Variable concentration distributions with depth of PFAS in soils were found with a maximum sum of PFAS of ~56 mg/kg dominated by perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). The maximum sum of PFAS in porewater was 13.5 mg/L. Comparison across all collocated soil and porewater concentrations did not provide consistent trends. PFAS mass fractions within lysimeter porewater samples were much higher for most PFAS than mass fractions determined from laboratory investigations, but the fraction was lower for PFOS. The results indicate preferential recovery of individual shorter chain PFAS via leaching at lower liquid: soil ratios such as those experienced under suction during recovery of porewater by lysimeters. Suggestions are offered to advance the use of suction lysimeters in promoting porewater PFAS concentrations as an alternative for regulatory compliance, and in closing the gap between field and laboratory approaches. There is merit in using lysimeters at PFAS field sites with improvements and considerations embraced.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference40 articles.

1. The Case for Direct Measures of Soil-to-Groundwater Contaminant Mass Discharge at AFFF-Impacted Sites

2. Assessment of PFAS in collocated soil and porewater samples at an AFFF-impacted source zone: Field-scale validation of suction lysimeters

3. AS.2005.Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil. Part 1: Non‐volatile and semi‐volatile compounds. Australian Standard – AS 4482.1‐2005.

4. ASC NEPM.2013.National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013. Schedule B2 “Guideline on Site Characterisation” National Environment Protection Council Australia 146.

5. ASLP.2019.Australian Standard 4439.3. Wastes sediments and contaminated soils. Part 3: Preparation of leachates—Bottle leaching procedure. Standards Australia Sydney NSW Australia.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3