Understanding the co‐construction of safety in the paediatric intensive care unit: A meta‐ethnography of parents' experiences

Author:

Seaton Sarah E.1ORCID,Manning Joseph C.23ORCID,Draper Elizabeth S.1,Davis Peter J.4,Mackintosh Nicola1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK

2. Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK

3. Centre for Children and Young People's Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK

4. Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundChildren experiencing critical illness or injury may require admission to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to receive life‐sustaining or life‐saving treatment. Studies have explored the experience of parents with a child in PICU but tend to focus on subgroups of children or specific healthcare systems. Therefore, we aimed to undertake a meta‐ethnography to draw together the published research.MethodsA systematic search strategy was developed to identify qualitative studies, which had explored the experiences of parents with a critically ill child treated in a PICU. A meta‐ethnography was undertaken following the structured steps of identifying the topic; undertaking a systematic search; reading the research; determining how the studies relate and translate into each other; and synthesising and expressing the results.ResultsWe identified 2989 articles from our search and after a systematic series of exclusions, 15 papers remaining for inclusion. We explored the original parent voices (first order) and the interpretation of the study authors (second order) to identify three third‐order concepts (our interpretation of the findings), which related to technical, relational and temporal factors. These factors influenced parents' experiences, providing both barriers and facilitators to how parents and caregivers experienced the time their child was in the PICU. The dynamic and co‐constructed nature of safety provided an analytical overarching frame of reference.ConclusionThis synthesis demonstrates novel ways in which parents and caregivers can contribute to the vital role of ensuring a co‐created safe healthcare environment for their child when receiving life‐saving care within the PICU.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3