Non‐negligible levels of implicit skin tone bias among Australian healthcare workers between 2007 and 2022: Analysis of subgroups and trends over time based on Project Implicit data

Author:

Ejova Anastasia12ORCID,van Antwerpen Natasha R.1,Semmler Carolyn1,Bean Christopher G.1,Green Deanne M.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Department of Psychology Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractImplicit (i.e. unconscious) racial biases held by health professionals negatively affect patient–practitioner communication and health outcomes. Implicit biases are typically assessed through implicit association tests (IATs). We extracted cross‐sectional IAT data originating in Australia from two large publicly available data sets hosted by Project Implicit. In total, IATs were available from 1956 healthcare workers (1249 of European ethnicity; 829 professionals/technicians as opposed to support workers). All had participated between 2006 and 2022. Levels of implicit skin tone bias were found to be moderate according to Project Implicit guidelines and substantially greater than zero (d = 0.87). Participants of European ethnicity and older age scored higher, but there were no differences across occupation types (professional vs. support worker) or over years. Consistent with findings around the world, the findings highlight a need for interventions that could reduce implicit bias and thereby improve the healthcare experiences of people from minority groups.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Social Sciences,Social Psychology

Reference83 articles.

1. Cross-Cultural Comparisons in Implicit and Explicit Age Bias

2. AHPRA. (2023).National scheme's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and cultural safety strategy.https://www.ahpra.gov.au/About‐Ahpra/Aboriginal‐and‐Torres‐Strait‐Islander‐Health‐Strategy/health‐and‐cultural‐safety‐strategy.aspx

3. Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Asylum Seekers in Australia: Demographic and Ideological Correlates

4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2022).Snapshot of Australia.https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people‐and‐communities/snapshot‐australia/latest‐release

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3