Focus versus format: An American view of South Korea's regional engagement

Author:

Cooper Zack1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. American Enterprise Institute Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractThe United States and South Korea are both shifting their engagement in the Indo‐Pacific, but in fundamentally different ways. In recent years, Washington has altered the format of its engagement in the region—shifting toward an increasingly minilateral approach seen in the Quad and AUKUS arrangements. On the other hand, Seoul has sought primarily to alter the focus of its engagement—shifting from a narrow focus on the Korean Peninsula toward a broader regional approach. In other words, American leaders have adjusted the format of their engagement while Korean leaders have adjusted the focus of their engagement. This has created a disconnect. As South Korea has aligned its focus to that of the United States, Seoul has expected Washington to integrate South Korea more deeply into American regional strategy. Yet, US efforts to build minilaterals have seldom included South Korea. Addressing this divide will require leaders in both capitals to adjust their approaches to both focus and format in the Indo‐Pacific.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference25 articles.

1. Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2021).ASEAN Outlook on the Indo‐Pacific.https://asean.org/asean2020/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ASEAN-Outlook-on-the-Indo-Pacific_FINAL_22062019.pdf

2. Recalibrating South Korea's role and regional network in the Indo‐Pacific: An analysis from a network‐centered approach

3. Do J.(2020). Korea urged to design new foreign policy strategies.The Korea Times.https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2020/05/120_289659.html

4. Fedasiuk R. &Silverberg E.(2022 June 28). From Maritime Quad to Tech Quintet.National Bureau of Asian Research.

5. Historical Institutionalism in International Relations

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3