Impact of preventive pill‐based treatment on migraine days: A secondary outcome study of the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial and a comparison of self‐report to nosology‐derived assessments

Author:

Gibler Robert C.12ORCID,Peugh James L.13,Coffey Christopher S.4,Chamberlin Leigh Ann1,Ecklund Dixie4,Klingner Elizabeth4,Yankey Jon4,Korbee Leslie L.5,Kabbouche Marielle6,Kacperski Joanne2,Porter Linda L.7,Reidy Brooke L.12,Hershey Andrew D.26ORCID,Powers Scott W.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA

2. Headache Center Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Ohio Cincinnati USA

3. Department of Pediatrics Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Ohio Cincinnati USA

4. Department of Biostatistics University of Iowa Iowa Iowa City USA

5. Academic Regulatory & Monitoring Services, LLC Cincinnati Ohio USA

6. Division of Neurology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Ohio Cincinnati USA

7. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine group differences in self‐reported migraine days among youth who completed the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial prior to its closure and explore the relationship between self‐reported and “nosology‐derived” (i.e., International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition [ICHD‐3]) migraine days.BackgroundThe CHAMP trial compared amitriptyline and topiramate to placebo for migraine prevention in youth and proposed to analyze change in migraine days as a secondary outcome. There is considerable variability in the field regarding what constitutes a “migraine day,” how this is determined and reported in trials, and how consistent these measures are with diagnostic nosology.MethodsCHAMP trial completers (N = 175) were randomized to receive amitriptyline (n = 77), topiramate (n = 63), or placebo (n = 35). Participants maintained daily headache diaries where they reported each day with headache and if they considered that headache to be a migraine. For each headache day, participants completed a symptom record and reported about symptoms such as pain location(s) and presence of nausea/vomiting or photophobia and phonophobia. We examined group differences in self‐reported migraine days at trial completion (summed from trial weeks 20–24) compared to baseline. We also used an algorithm to determine whether participants’ symptom reports met ICHD‐3 criteria for migraine without aura, and examined the association between self‐reported and “nosology‐derived” migraine days.ResultsResults showed no significant differences between groups in self‐reported migraine days over the course of the trial. Self‐reported and “nosology‐derived” migraine days during the baseline and treatment phases were strongly associated (r's = 0.73 and 0.83, respectively; p's < 0.001).ConclusionRegardless of treatment, CHAMP trial completers showed clinically important reductions in self‐reported migraine days over the course of the trial (about 3.8 days less). The strong association between self‐reported and “nosology‐derived” migraine days suggests youth with migraine can recognize a day with migraine and reliably report their headache features and symptoms. Greater rigor and transparency in the calculation and reporting of migraine days in trials is needed.

Funder

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Validity of self‐reported migraine in adolescents and children;Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain;2023-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3