Scar‐related atrial macroreentries: Different arrhymogenic basis generates different reentry type

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCatheter ablation is an established therapeutic strategy to treat scar‐related macroreentry atrial tachycardia (MAT). However, the scar properties and arrhythmogenicity and the reentry type have not been clearly defined.Methods and ResultsA total of 122 patients with scar‐related MAT were enrolled in this study. The atrial scars were classified into two categories: spontaneous scars (Group A: n = 28) and iatrogenic scars (Group B: n = 94). According to the relationship between scar location and the reentry circuit, MAT was described as scar pro‐flutter MAT, scar‐dependent MAT, and scar‐mediated MAT. The reentry type of MAT was significantly different between Groups A and B: pro‐flutter (40.5% vs. 62.0%, p = 0.02), scar‐dependent AT (40.5% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001), and scar‐mediated AT (19.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.42). After a median follow‐up of 25 months, 21 patients with AT recurrence were observed. Compared with the spontaneous group, there was a lower recurrence rate of MAT in the iatrogenic group (28.6% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.03).ConclusionScar‐related MAT has three reentry types, and the proportion of each type varies with the scar properties and its arrhythmogenic basis. Optimization of the ablation strategy based on the scar properties to improve the long‐term outcome of catheter ablation of MAT is necessary.