Using GPT‐4 for LI‐RADS feature extraction and categorization with multilingual free‐text reports

Author:

Gu Kyowon1ORCID,Lee Jeong Hyun1ORCID,Shin Jaeseung1,Hwang Jeong Ah1ORCID,Min Ji Hye1,Jeong Woo Kyoung1,Lee Min Woo1ORCID,Song Kyoung Doo1,Bae Sung Hwan2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

2. Department of Radiology Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsThe Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) offers a standardized approach for imaging hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the diverse styles and structures of radiology reports complicate automatic data extraction. Large language models hold the potential for structured data extraction from free‐text reports. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of Generative Pre‐trained Transformer (GPT)‐4 in extracting LI‐RADS features and categories from free‐text liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports.MethodsThree radiologists generated 160 fictitious free‐text liver MRI reports written in Korean and English, simulating real‐world practice. Of these, 20 were used for prompt engineering, and 140 formed the internal test cohort. Seventy‐two genuine reports, authored by 17 radiologists were collected and de‐identified for the external test cohort. LI‐RADS features were extracted using GPT‐4, with a Python script calculating categories. Accuracies in each test cohort were compared.ResultsOn the external test, the accuracy for the extraction of major LI‐RADS features, which encompass size, nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement, nonperipheral ‘washout’, enhancing ‘capsule’ and threshold growth, ranged from .92 to .99. For the rest of the LI‐RADS features, the accuracy ranged from .86 to .97. For the LI‐RADS category, the model showed an accuracy of .85 (95% CI: .76, .93).ConclusionsGPT‐4 shows promise in extracting LI‐RADS features, yet further refinement of its prompting strategy and advancements in its neural network architecture are crucial for reliable use in processing complex real‐world MRI reports.

Funder

Korea Health Industry Development Institute

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3