The effectiveness of maternal regulatory attempts in the development of infant emotion regulation

Abstract

AbstractCaregivers are instrumental in the development of infant emotion regulation; however, few studies have focused on delineating the real‐time effectiveness of strategies that caregivers use to reduce infant distress. It is also unclear whether certain caregiver traits facilitate engagement in more successful regulation strategies. This study addressed these gaps by: (1) examining the differential effectiveness of maternal regulatory attempts (MRAs; behavioral strategies initiated by mothers to assist infants with regulating emotional states) in reducing 12‐ to 24‐month‐old infants' frustration during a toy removal task; and (2) assessing whether maternal mind‐mindedness (mothers' attunement to their infant's mental state) predicted mothers' selection of MRAs. Multilevel modeling revealed that distraction and control were the most effective MRAs in reducing infant negative affect across 5‐s intervals (N = 82 dyads; M infant age = 18 months; 45 females). Greater use of non‐attuned mind‐related speech predicted less engagement in effective MRAs, supporting a link between caregivers' socio‐cognitive skills and provision of in‐the‐moment regulation support. These findings highlight the value of considering caregiver regulatory behaviors as a target for elucidating how maternal socialization of emotion regulation occurs in real‐time. They also underscore mothers' important role as socializing agents in the development of this foundational developmental ability.