Meta‐analysis: Enhanced liver fibrosis test to identify hepatic fibrosis in chronic liver diseases

Author:

Hinkson Alexander123ORCID,Lally Hannah4,Gibson Hannah4,Jones Rebecca1,Rowe Ian A.123ORCID,Shinkins Bethany5ORCID,Parker Richard12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leeds Liver Unit St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK

2. Leeds Liver Research Group University of Leeds Leeds UK

3. Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds Leeds UK

4. School of Medicine, University of Leeds Leeds UK

5. Test Evaluation Group Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds Leeds UK

Abstract

SummaryBackground & AimsPatients with liver disease can be stratified for risk of liver‐related ill health by degree of hepatic fibrosis. The Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test was developed to quantify hepatic fibrosis non‐invasively and is widely used. The objective of this review was to identify and synthesise the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the ELF test for staging of hepatic fibrosis.Approach & ResultsSearches of PubMed and EMBASE were conducted between October 2020 and November 2021 to identify studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of the ELF test compared to histology in liver disease patients. QUADAS‐2 was used to assess risk of bias in each study. Meta‐analysis using the multiple thresholds model described by Steinhauser S, Schumacher M, Rücker G. Modelling multiple thresholds in meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2016;16. 10.1186/s12874‐016‐0196‐1 allowed synthesis of 2 × 2 data at different cut‐offs. Sixty‐three studies were included in this review. These studies included 19,285 patients with or at risk of liver disease from viral hepatitis, Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Alcohol‐related Liver Disease and other mixed chronic liver diseases. The prevalence of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 47.5%, 39.2% and 4.4%, respectively. Cut‐offs with maximal Youden index were generated with AUROC = 0.811 (95% CI: 0.736–0.870), 0.812 (95% CI: 0.758–0.856) and 0.810 (95% CI: 0.694–0.888) to detect significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of the ELF test varied between different liver diseases and cut‐offs to detect each stage with 95% sensitivity or specificity were also generated.ConclusionsMeta‐analysis revealed considerable variability in the ability of ELF to stage fibrosis across disease aetiologies. Research has mostly focused on viral hepatitis and NAFLD. There is currently a lack of data on the value of the ELF test in Alcohol‐related liver disease and patients in primary care settings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Gastroenterology,Hepatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3