Efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine treatment in Japanese patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

Author:

Ohtani Yohei1,Tani Hideaki1,Nomoto‐Takahashi Kie1,Yatomi Taisuke1,Yonezawa Kengo1,Tomiyama Sota1,Nagai Nobuhiro12,Kusudo Keisuke1,Honda Shiori1,Moriyama Sotaro1,Nakajima Shinichiro1,Yamada Takashige3ORCID,Morisaki Hiroshi3,Iwabuchi Yu4,Jinzaki Masahiro4,Yoshimura Kimio5,Eiro Tsuyoshi6,Tsugawa Sakiko16,Ichijo Sadamitsu6,Fujimoto Yu6,Miyazaki Tomoyuki6,Takahashi Takuya6,Uchida Hiroyuki1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuropsychiatry Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Psychiatry Minami‐Hanno Hospital Saitama Japan

3. Department of Anesthesiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

4. Department of Radiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

5. Department of Health Policy and Management Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

6. Department of Physiology Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan

Abstract

AimAlthough the antidepressant effect of ketamine on treatment‐resistant depression (TRD) has been frequently reported in North American and European countries, evidence is scarce among the Asian population. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine in Japanese patients with TRD.MethodsIn this double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled trial, 34 Japanese patients with TRD were randomized to receive either intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo, administered over 40 min, twice a week, for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to post‐treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in other depressive symptomatology scores and remission, response, and partial response rates. We also examined the association between baseline clinical demographic characteristics and changes in the MADRS total score.ResultsIntention‐to‐treat analysis indicated no significant difference in the decrease in MADRS total score between the groups (−8.1 ± 10.0 vs −2.5 ± 5.2, t[32] = 2.02, P = 0.052), whereas per‐protocol analysis showed a significant reduction in the ketamine group compared to the placebo group (−9.1 ± 10.2 vs −2.7 ± 5.3, t[29] = 2.22, P = 0.034). No significant group differences were observed in other outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in the ketamine group than in the placebo group, and no serious adverse events were reported. A higher baseline MADRS total score and body mass index were associated with a greater reduction in the MADRS total score.ConclusionIntravenous ketamine outperformed placebo in Japanese patients with TRD who completed the study, suggesting that ketamine could alleviate depressive symptoms of TRD across diverse ethnic populations.

Funder

SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology

Takeda Science Foundation

Japan Science and Technology Agency

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3