Perceived Work Environment and Work‐Related Well‐Being in Nursing Homes: Comparison of Different Care Worker Groups

Author:

Geyskens Lisa12ORCID,Backhaus Ramona345,Declercq Anja67,Godderis Lode89,Heeren Pieter1011,Janssens Lien1,Khan Nasrin1,Milisen Koen1112,Trybou Jeroen13,Van Pottelbergh Gijs14,Vlaeyen Ellen1011,Zúñiga Franziska15,Deschodt Mieke116ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

2. Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) Brussels Belgium

3. Fliedner Fachhochschule University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf Germany

4. Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands

5. Living‐Lab in Ageing and Long‐Term Care Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands

6. CESO Centre for Sociological Research KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

7. LUCAS Centre for Care Research and Consultancy KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

8. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

9. IDEWE External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work Heverlee Belgium

10. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium

11. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

12. Department of Geriatric Medicine University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium

13. Department of Public Health and Primary Care Ghent University Ghent Belgium

14. Department of Public Health and Primary Care Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven Belgium

15. Nursing Science, Department Public Health University of Basel Basel Switzerland

16. Competence Center of Nursing University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundA skilled and diverse healthcare workforce is essential in nursing homes, yet recruitment and retention remain a major challenge. Gaining insight into the well‐being of different care worker groups and how they perceive their work environment can highlight areas of concern and opportunities for improvement.AimsTo compare the perceived work environment and well‐being among different care worker groups in nursing homes.MethodsThis descriptive study used cross‐sectional survey data from the Flanders Nursing Home (FLANH) project, collected from February–July 2023. A total of 1521 care workers from 25 Flemish nursing homes participated (64.4% response rate), including care assistants (43.7%), registered nurses (20.5%), support staff (15.4%), allied health professionals (14.8%), and team leaders (5.7%). Chi‐squared tests were used to compare the percentages of the care worker groups reporting the work environment items and well‐being outcomes (job satisfaction, intention to leave, burnout). Post hoc analyses were conducted to identify which groups contributed to the significant differences observed.ResultsSignificant differences among care worker groups were found for almost all work environment items and well‐being outcomes. Staffing adequacy was perceived least among care assistants and registered nurses. More registered nurses and team leaders perceived high workload and emotional burden compared to the other groups. Work–life interference and involvement were perceived most among team leaders. A person‐centered vision, work autonomy, and salary satisfaction were reported most among allied health professionals and team leaders. Skill use and training opportunities were reported least among support staff. Work‐related well‐being appeared to be experienced most among allied health professionals and least among care assistants.Linking Evidence to ActionThese findings highlight key differences in work environment perceptions and well‐being among care worker groups, offering valuable insights for tailored initiatives to foster a supportive workplace that benefits the well‐being of all types of care workers in nursing homes.

Funder

Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3