Non‐peer professionals' understanding of recovery and attitudes towards peer support workers joining existing community mental health teams in the North Denmark Region: A qualitative study

Author:

Lerbæk Birgitte1ORCID,Johansen Kirsten12ORCID,Burholt Alice Katrine1,Gregersen Line Myrup3,Terp Malene Østergaard3ORCID,Slade Mike45ORCID,Castelein Stynke67ORCID,Jørgensen Rikke18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unit for Psychiatric Research Aalborg University Hospital – Psychiatry Aalborg Denmark

2. Unit for Forensic Research Mental Health Department Middelfart, Psychiatry Region of Southern Denmark Middelfart Denmark

3. Center for Recovery and Co‐Creation Psychiatry – Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark

4. School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

5. Health and Community Participation Division, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences Nord University Namsos Norway

6. Lentis Research, Lentis Psychiatric Institute Groningen The Netherlands

7. Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

8. Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

Abstract

AbstractPeer support is a collaborative practice where people with lived experience of mental health conditions engage in supporting like‐minded. Peer support impacts on personal recovery and empowerment and creates value at an organisational level. However, the implementation of peer support into existing mental health services is often impeded by barriers embedded in organisational culture and support in role expectations. Non‐peer professionals' recovery orientation and attitudes towards peer support workers (PSWs) are essential factors in the implementation of peer support, and this study explored non‐peer professionals' understanding of recovery and their attitudes towards PSWs joining existing community mental health teams in one region of Denmark. In total, 17 non‐peer professionals participated in three focus groups. Thematic analysis led to three themes: (1) Recovery is a process of “getting better” and balancing personal and clinical perspectives; (2) Realising recovery‐oriented practice: a challenging task with conflicting values; and (3) Expectations and concerns about peer support workers joining the team. Recovery‐oriented practice faces challenging conditions in contemporary mental health services due to a dominant focus on biomedical aspects in care and treatment. Implementation facilitators and barriers in the employment of PSWs point towards fundamental aspects that must be present when employing PSWs in an organisation. The issues described leading up to the employment of PSWs reflected in this study underpin the importance of preparing an organisation for the employment of PSWs based on the available knowledge.

Funder

Novo Nordisk

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3