Low‐ versus high‐concentration intravenous immunoglobulin for children with Kawasaki disease in the acute phase

Author:

Suzuki Takanori12ORCID,Michihata Nobuaki3ORCID,Yoshikawa Tetsushi2,Saito Kazuyoshi2,Matsui Hiroki4,Fushimi Kiyohide5,Yasunaga Hideo4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Cardiology Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center Aichi Japan

2. Department of Pediatrics Fujita Health University Aichi Japan

3. Department of Health Services Research Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan

4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics School of Public Health The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan

5. Department of Health Policy and Informatics Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractPurposeFew studies have compared the effects of low‐concentration (5%) and high‐concentration (10%) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations for patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) in the acute phase. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between low‐ and high‐concentration IVIG preparations in children with KD, using a national inpatient database in Japan.MethodWe used the Diagnostic Procedure Combination database to identify patients with KD treated with IVIG from April 2012 to March 2020. We identified those receiving high‐ and low‐concentration IVIG preparations as an initial treatment. The outcomes included the proportions of patients with coronary artery abnormalities (CAAs) and IVIG resistance, length of stay, and medical costs. Propensity score‐matched analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes between the 2 groups. Instrumental variable analyses were performed to confirm the results.ResultWe identified 48 046 patients with KD and created 4:1 propensity score‐matched pairs between the low‐ and high‐concentration IVIG groups. There was a significant difference in the percentage with IVIG resistance between the 2 groups (20.6% vs 24.1%; risk difference, 3.5% [95% confidence interval, 2.3‐4.7]; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in CAAs (1.6% vs 1.6%; risk difference, 0.013% [95% confidence interval, −0.34 to 0.37]; P = .953). The instrumental variable analyses showed similar results.ConclusionsThe proportion of CAAs did not differ significantly between those receiving low‐ and high‐concentration IVIG. To confirm the results of this study, prospective studies adjusting for duration of IVIG administration and duration of observation are needed.

Funder

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3