Mini‐open Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy versus Standard Posterior Approach for Ankylosing Spondylitis‐related Spinal Kyphosis: A Comparative Study

Author:

Si Gao123,Qiu Weipeng234,Shen Qixian4,Wang Yongqiang123,Li Weishi123,Yu Miao123ORCID,Wang Yu5

Affiliation:

1. Peking University Third Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics Beijing China

2. Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine Beijing China

3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research Beijing China

4. Peking University Health Science Center Beijing China

5. Peking University First Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics Beijing China

Abstract

ObjectiveSurgical strategy for spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been challenging. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) through a minimally invasive (MI) approach has been developed with promising clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PSO via an MI approach and a standard posterior approach (SPA) for treating AS‐related spinal kyphosis.MethodsA total of 41 patients with AS‐related spinal kyphosis who underwent PSO through an MI approach (MI surgery [MIS] group: n = 25) or SPA (SPA group: n = 16) between January 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively included. Spinopelvic parameters were evaluated before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and at the 2‐year follow‐up. Clinical data including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, level of fusion, incision length, bed rest period, length of hospitalization, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument‐22 (SRS‐22) was administered to assess patients' quality of life at the latest follow‐up. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using independent sample t‐test or Chi‐square test.ResultsCharacteristics and baseline kyphosis of the two groups were matched. At the 2‐year follow‐up, in the MIS group, the average correction values of the sagittal vertical axis and global kyphosis (GK) were 9.5 cm and 44.3°, respectively. Compared with the SPA group, the MIS group had similar correction values and correction losses after surgery. No obvious differences were observed in any radiographic parameters, except for GK, immediately after surgery and at the 2‐year follow‐up between the two groups (p > 0.05). The MIS group had a significantly shorter operative time, lesser blood loss, lesser transfusion volume, shorter fusion level, and lesser time to mobilization than did the SPA group. Higher average functional activity scores of SRS‐22 were obtained in the MIS group than in the SPA group.ConclusionMini‐open PSO may be an effective alternative to the SPA for treating AS‐related spinal kyphosis, with comparable correction effect, lesser surgical trauma and faster recovery. This comparative study may provide valuable guidance for surgical decision‐making and patient counseling.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3