Outcome‐Based Typology of Social Enterprises: Interlacing Individual Transformation, Capital Provision, and Societal Influence

Author:

Polychronopoulos Georgios1ORCID,Lukeš Martin1ORCID,Sansone Giuliano12ORCID,Agrawal Anirudh13ORCID,Ulrich‐Diener Florian1ORCID,Šlapáková Losová Veronika1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Entrepreneurship Prague University of Economics and Business

2. College of Business, University College Dublin

3. Alliance University Bengaluru India

Abstract

AbstractSocial entrepreneurship has emerged as a global phenomenon aimed at tackling societal grand challenges through market‐based activities. A holistic understanding of social enterprise outcomes is crucial for reflecting their effectiveness in meeting social objectives and informing internal organizational processes. This study explores the outcomes of social enterprises through a comparative qualitative analysis of 49 social ventures in Austria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United States, spanning diverse sectors. Three key outcome dimensions are identified: individual transformation, capital provision, and societal influence. Our analysis results in a typology of seven distinct types of social enterprises, each integrating these dimensions to varying degrees. Utilizing this typology, we reveal how social enterprises navigate barriers to solving complex social and environmental problems, illustrating the dynamic interplay between outcome dimensions and the importance of multi‐objective organizing – beyond hybrid organizing – in addressing complex societal issues.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference103 articles.

1. Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research;Alvesson M.;Academy of Management Review,2003

2. Generating research questions through problematization;Alvesson M.;Academy of Management Review,2011

3. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study;Alvord S. H.;The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2004

4. Advocacy organizations in the US political process;Andrews K. T.;Annual Review of Sociology,2004

5. Impact at the “bottom of the pyramid”: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment;Ansari S.;Journal of Management Studies,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3