Ambulance clinician use of capillary blood ketone meters to improve emergency hyperglycaemia care: A stepped‐wedged controlled, mixed‐methods feasibility study

Author:

Prothero Larissa Stella1ORCID,Strudwick Thomas1ORCID,Foster Theresa1ORCID,Lake Andrea Kathleen2ORCID,Boyle Adrian2ORCID,Clark Allan3ORCID,Williams Julia4ORCID,Rayman Gerry35ORCID,Dhatariya Ketan36ORCID

Affiliation:

1. East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust Barton Mills Suffolk UK

2. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge Cambridgeshire UK

3. Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich Norfolk UK

4. School of Health and Social Work University of Hertfordshire Hatfield Hertfordshire UK

5. East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust Ipswich Suffolk UK

6. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Norwich Norfolk UK

Abstract

AbstractAimTo determine whether it was feasible, safe and acceptable for ambulance clinicians to use capillary blood ketone meters for ‘high‐risk’ diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recognition and fluid initiation, to inform the need for a full‐powered, multi‐centre trial.MethodsAdopting a stepped‐wedge controlled design, participants with hyperglycaemia (capillary blood glucose >11.0 mmol/L) or diabetes and unwell were recruited. ‘High‐risk’ DKA intervention participants (capillary blood ketones ≥3.0 mmol/L) received paramedic‐led fluid therapy. Participant demographic and clinical data were collated from ambulance and hospital care records. Twenty ambulance and Emergency Department clinicians were interviewed to understand their hyperglycaemia and DKA care experiences.ResultsIn this study, 388 participants were recruited (Control: n = 203; Intervention: n = 185). Most presented with hyperglycaemia, and incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes was 18.5% and 74.3%, respectively. Ketone meter use facilitated ‘high‐risk’ DKA identification (control: 2.5%, n = 5; intervention: 6.5%, n = 12) and was associated with improved hospital pre‐alerting. Ambulance clinicians appeared to have a high index of suspicion for hospital‐diagnosed DKA participants. One third (33.3%; n = 3) of Control and almost half (45.5%; n = 5) of Intervention DKA participants received pre‐hospital fluid therapy.Key interview themes included clinical assessment, ambulance DKA fluid therapy, clinical handovers; decision support tool; hospital DKA management; barriers to hospital DKA care.ConclusionsAmbulance capillary blood ketone meter use was deemed feasible, safe and acceptable. Opportunities for improved clinical decision making, support and safety‐netting, as well as in‐hospital DKA care, were recognised. As participant recruitment was below progression threshold, it is recommended that future‐related research considers alternative trial designs. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04940897.

Funder

Diabetes UK

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3