Automated decision‐making: Toward a people‐centred approach

Author:

Lomborg Stine1ORCID,Kaun Anne2ORCID,Scott Hansen Sne1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Media and Communication Studies Södertörn University Huddinge Sweden

Abstract

AbstractRecently, automated decision‐making (ADM) has been increasingly introduced in for example, the public sector potentially ensuring efficiency and more just decision‐making. The increasing use of ADM has been reflected by a growing interest by scholarly research. While initially mainly researchers within law and computer sciences engaged with ADM, there has also been a growing engagement by social science and humanities‐oriented researchers. This article traces the emergence and evolution of ADM research beyond computer sciences and engineering with a specific focus on social sciences and humanities by identifying central concerns and methods while outlining a stable baseline for future research. Based on a systematic mapping of publications, we outline the contours of ADM as an area of research engaging with an emerging empirical phenomenon. Drawing on findings from the mapping, we discuss ways ahead for ADM research as part of the subfield of digital sociology and suggest that sociological media and communication studies have a crucial role to play in developing future research avenues. Drawing on advances made in audience research, we suggest a radically contextualized and people‐centered approach to ADM. Such an approach would help to develop ADM and ground it alongside people's divergent capabilities and contextual arrangements.

Funder

Östersjöstiftelsen

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference49 articles.

1. AlgorithmWatch. (2019).Automating society: Taking stock of automated decision‐making in the EU. Retrieved March 18 2022 fromhttps://algorithmwatch.org/en/wp‐content/uploads/2019/02/Automating_Society_Report_2019.pdf

2. Mind Scripting

3. Algorithmic Profiling of Job Seekers in Austria: How Austerity Politics Are Made Effective

4. The law of equal opportunities or unintended consequences?: The effect of unisex risk assessment in consumer credit

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3