Placement of peripherally inserted central catheter through upper versus lower limb vein in neonates: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Zhao Xuetang1,Liu Yingfei1,Li Xiaoyan1,Wei Li1,Bian Lanzheng2,Peng Mingqi2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu China

2. Department of Nursing Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu China

Abstract

AbstractAimPeripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is an important treatment for the drug and nutrition administration in neonates. We aimed to evaluate the effects and safety of PICC placement through upper versus lower limb vein in neonates, to provide insights into the clinical PICC nursing care.DesignA meta‐analysis.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, China national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Weipu Database, China Biomedical Literature Database for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the placement of PICC via upper limb and lower limb venipuncture. Two reviewers independently evaluated and cross‐checked the quality of the included studies in accordance with the quality standards of the Cochrane Manual. We used RevMan 5.3 software for statistical processing.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs were included in this meta‐analysis. Meta‐analysis indicated that compared with upper limb veins, PICC insertion through lower limb veins is beneficial to increase the one‐time puncture success rate (relative risk [RR]  =  0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68–0.79) and the indwelling time (mean difference [MD] =  −3.60, 95% CI: −5.35 to −1.86), reduce the operation time (MD =  10.37, 95% CI: 7.48–13.26), estimated bleeding volume (MD =  0.55, 95% CI: 0.34–0.75), incidence of catheter ectopia (RR  =  2.46, 95% CI: 1.81–3.35), PICC‐associated infection (RR  =  2.82, 95% CI: 1.65–4.83), exosmosis (RR  =  2.45, 95% CI: 1.49–4.04, p < .001) and phlebitis (RR  =  1.40, 95% CI: 1.03–1.90). No significant difference in the Incidence of catheter obstruction between the upper and lower limb veins (RR  =  1.20, 95% CI: 0.73–1.97, p = .48) was found.Public ContributionThere are certain advantages in neonatal PICC puncture through the lower limb vein. The lower limb vein may be the preferred choice for neonatal PICC puncture.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pediatrics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3