Abstract
AbstractFor the last 20 years, Euroscepticism has become a stable component of European politics and has attracted much attention. European elections have provided Eurosceptic parties with an opportunity to get parliamentary representation. While there is a burgeoning literature on the Eurosceptic stances of these parties, there remains relatively little research on their strategies once inside the European Parliament. This article analyzes how Eurosceptic MEPs from the ‘untidy right’ conceive and carry out their representative mandate in an institution they despise. First, it takes an historical perspective to show that despite the persistence of Euroscepticism in the European Union's elected chamber, the body of research remains comparatively limited. Second, it examines the institutional constraints faced by Eurosceptic representatives resulting from the institutional environment and the ideological heterogeneity of these actors. The final part proposes a typology of parliamentary roles to account for their attitudes and behaviours inside the chamber.
Reference43 articles.
1. Bale T.andTaggart P.(2006)‘First‐Timers Yes Virgins No: The Roles and Backgrounds of New Members of the European Parliament’. SEI Working Paper 89 (Brighton:Sussex European Institute).
2. Benedetto G.(2008)‘Explaining the Failure of Euroscepticism in the European Parliament’. InSzczerbiak A.andTaggart P.(eds).
3. Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: Exit or Voice?
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献