Affiliation:
1. Unversity College London
2. University of Montreal
3. Adobe Research
Abstract
AbstractWe present an automated technique for computing a map between two genus‐zero shapes, which matches semantically corresponding regions to one another. Lack of annotated data prohibits direct inference of 3D semantic priors; instead, current state‐of‐the‐art methods predominantly optimize geometric properties or require varying amounts of manual annotation. To overcome the lack of annotated training data, we distill semantic matches from pre‐trained vision models: our method renders the pair of untextured 3D shapes from multiple viewpoints; the resulting renders are then fed into an off‐the‐shelf image‐matching strategy that leverages a pre‐trained visual model to produce feature points. This yields semantic correspondences, which are projected back to the 3D shapes, producing a raw matching that is inaccurate and inconsistent across different viewpoints. These correspondences are refined and distilled into an inter‐surface map by a dedicated optimization scheme, which promotes bijectivity and continuity of the output map. We illustrate that our approach can generate semantic surface‐to‐surface maps, eliminating manual annotations or any 3D training data requirement. Furthermore, it proves effective in scenarios with high semantic complexity, where objects are non‐isometrically related, as well as in situations where they are nearly isometric.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Reference89 articles.
1. AbdelreheemA. EldesokeyA. OvsjanikovM. WonkaP.: Zero‐shot 3d shape correspondence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03253(2023). 3
2. AmirS. GandelsmanY. BagonS. DekelT.: Deep vit features as dense visual descriptors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05814(2021). 2 3 4 5
3. AsirvathamA. PraunE. HoppeH.: Consistent spherical parameterization. InComputer Graphics and Geometric Modeling (CGGM) 2005 Workshop(2005). 3
4. Lifted bijections for low distortion surface mappings
5. Seamless surface mappings