Achieving goal‐concordant care: Formal and informal advance care planning for White, Black, and Hispanic older adults

Author:

Lenko Rachel A.1ORCID,Hoffman Geoffrey J.2,Robinson‐Lane Sheria G.2,Silveira Maria J.3,Voepel‐Lewis Terri4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing Calvin University School of Health Grand Rapids Michigan USA

2. Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership University of Michigan School of Nursing Ann Arbor Michigan USA

3. Palliative Care Program, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences University of Michigan School of Nursing Ann Arbor Michigan USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAdvance care planning (ACP) aims to ensure that patients receive goal‐concordant care (GCC), which is especially important for racially or ethnically minoritized populations at greater risk of poor end‐of‐life outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of advance directives (i.e., formal ACP) or goals‐of‐care conversations (i.e., informal ACP) on such care. This study aimed to examine the relationship between each of formal and informal ACP and goal‐concordant end‐of‐life care among older Americans and to determine whether their impact differed between individuals identified as White, Black, or Hispanic.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2012–2018 data from the biennial Health and Retirement Study. We examined the relationships of interest using two, separate multivariable logistic regression models. Model 1 regressed a proxy report of GCC on formal and informal ACP and sociodemographic and health‐related covariates. Model 2 added interaction terms between race/ethnicity and the two types of ACP.ResultsOur sample included 2048 older adults. There were differences in the proportions of White, Black, and Hispanic decedents who received GCC (83.1%, 75.3%, and 71.3%, respectively, p < 0.001) and in the use of each type of ACP by racial/ethnic group. In model 1, informal compared with no informal ACP was associated with higher odds of GCC (adjusted odds ratio = 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.82]). In model 2, Black decedents who had formal ACP were more likely to receive GCC than those who did not, but there were no statistically significant differences between decedents of different racial/ethnic groups who had no ACP, informal ACP only, or both types of ACP.ConclusionsOur results build on previous work by indicating the importance of incorporating goals‐of‐care conversations into routine healthcare for older adults and encouraging ACP usage among racially and ethnically minoritized populations who use ACP tools at lower rates.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Institute of Nursing Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3