The relatives of people with depression: A systematic review and methodological critique of qualitative studies

Author:

Buus Niels123ORCID,Petersen Alan4ORCID,McPherson Susan5ORCID,Meadows Graham678910ORCID,Brand Gabrielle1ORCID,Ong Ben13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

3. Open Dialogue Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. School of Health and Social Care University of Essex Essex UK

6. School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

8. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

9. Centre for Mental Health, School of Global and Population Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

10. Monash Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBeing a close relative of a person with depression can take a heavy toll on the former, but these relatives are increasingly made responsible for taking on extensive carer roles. Research on relatives of people with depression is currently dominated by a focus on “carer burden” and although such a focus can explain many relatives' experiences and daily lives, it provides very limited insight into the everyday life of a person living with someone with depression. Therefore, we scoped qualitative research on people who are relatives of people living with depression and identified knowledge gaps caused by explicit or implicit theoretical or methodological assumptions. We conducted an exhaustive literature search in CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and Eric. In total, 34 publications were included, their quality evaluated and their findings mapped and summarized. We identified four interrelated and overlapping themes that dominated the findings of the publications: (a) recognition of “depression”, (b) emotional responses, (c) interruptions of relationships, and (d) a staged psychosocial process. The vast majority of studies presented de‐contextualized and underinterpreted analyses assuming a homogeneity of (illness) experiences and disregarded the important influence of social contributors to social relationships, connectedness, and mental health problems.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3