Medicaid coverage for gender‐affirming surgery: A state‐by‐state review

Author:

LaGuardia Jonnby S.1,Chin Madeline G.1,Fadich Sarah1,Morgan Katarina B. J.2,Ngo Halena H.3,Bedar Meiwand1,Moghadam Shahrzad1,Huang Kelly X.1,Mallory Christy4,Lee Justine C.15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery University of California Los Angeles California USA

2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Cambridge Massachusetts USA

3. Harvard Law School Cambridge Massachusetts USA

4. Williams Institute University of California Los Angeles School of Law Los Angeles California USA

5. UCLA Gender Health Program Los Angeles California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo systematically review Medicaid policies state‐by‐state for gender‐affirming surgery coverage.Data Sources and Study SettingPrimary data were collected for each US state utilizing the LexisNexis legal database, state legislature publications, and Medicaid manuals.Study DesignA cross‐sectional study evaluating Medicaid coverage for numerous gender‐affirming surgeries.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsWe previously reported on state health policies that protect gender‐affirming care under Medicaid coverage. Building upon our prior work, we systematically assessed the 27 states with protective policies to determine coverage for each type of gender‐affirming surgery. We analyzed Medicaid coverage for gender‐affirming surgeries in four domains: chest, genital, craniofacial and neck reconstruction, and miscellaneous procedures. Medicaid coverage for each type of surgery was categorized as explicitly covered, explicitly noncovered, or not described.Principal FindingsAmong the 27 states with protective Medicaid policies, 17 states (63.0%) provided explicit coverage for at least one gender‐affirming chest procedure and at least one gender‐affirming genital procedure, while only eight states (29.6%) provided explicit coverage for at least one craniofacial and neck procedure (p = 0.04). Coverage for specific surgical procedures within these three anatomical domains varied. The most common explicitly covered procedures were breast reduction/mastectomy and hysterectomy (n = 17, 63.0%). The most common explicitly noncovered surgery was reversal surgery (n = 12, 44.4%). Several states did not describe the specific surgical procedures covered; thus, final coverage rates are indeterminate.ConclusionsIn 2022, 52.9% of states had health policies that protected gender‐affirming care under Medicaid; however, coverage for various gender‐affirming surgical procedures remains both variable and occasionally unspecified. When specified, craniofacial and neck reconstruction is the least covered anatomical area compared with chest and genital reconstruction.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. ProjectMA.Equality maps: Healthcare laws and policies. Movement Advancement Project. Accessed August 19 2022 https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/healthcare_laws_and_policies

2. MalloryC TentindoW.Medicaid coverage for gender‐affirming care. 2019. Research that matters. Accessed January 1 2020.https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp‐content/uploads/Medicaid‐Gender‐Affirming‐Oct‐2019.pdf

3. United States Health Policies on Gender-Affirming Care in 2022

4. Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE‐2010‐title42/pdf/USCODE‐2010‐title42‐chap157‐subchapVI‐sec18116.pdf

5. Trends in Gender-affirming Surgery in Insured Patients in the United States

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3