Tiered network health plans and changes in physician practice intensity

Author:

Prager Elena1,Sinaiko Anna D.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Simon Business School University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

2. Department of Health Policy & Management Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine whether physicians in tiered physician networks where tier assignments are based on “intensity” of care, which is the quantity of resources used per‐episode of care, change their intensity after learning detailed information about how their intensity compares to their peers.Data SourcesAdministrative data on intensity and quality at the physician‐episode level for all physicians included in a tiered physician network offered through the Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission (GIC) in 2010–2015. Data on physicians' share of revenue from GIC patients from the 2012 Massachusetts All‐Payer Claims Database.Study DesignFor 21,086 physicians in seven specialties, we estimate the impact of the dissemination of detailed intensity performance information in 2014 on physician intensity per episode of care overall and decomposed into physician services, facility, and pharmaceutical subcomponents. Intensity outcomes were measured using a standardized price schedule. Using a difference‐in‐differences regression, we compared physicians with high exposure to the tiered network via a large share of their revenue coming from GIC patients (“GIC share”) to physicians who were less exposed. Measures of intensity of care and GIC share were log‐transformed, and models controlled for physician‐episode type fixed effects.Data Extraction MethodsWe linked GIC share to administrative data using National Provider Identifier.Principal FindingsThere were no statistically significant differences in total intensity of care with the informational intervention for physicians in procedure‐based specialties (−0.12 elasticity of intensity per episode with respect to GIC patient share, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.06) or in relationship‐based specialties (0.09, 95% CI −0.15 to 0.33). There were also no differences in intensity of subcomponents of care following the intervention.ConclusionsTiered network incentives had no detectable impact on intensity of care that physicians provided to patients.

Funder

National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Reference31 articles.

1. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC).Medicare Payment Policy: Report to the Congress.2022www.medpac.gov

2. Purchaser Business Group on Health.What we Do: Driving Affordability. PBGH. Published March 26 2022.www.pbgh.org

3. Moral Hazard and Risk Spreading in Partnerships

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3