Eliminating health care inequities through strengthening access to care

Author:

Jindal Monique1,Chaiyachati Krisda H.23,Fung Vicki4ORCID,Manson Spero M.5,Mortensen Karoline6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Academic Internal Medicine University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

2. Verily, Inc. South San Francisco California USA

3. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Mongan Institute Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA

6. Department of Health Management and Policy Miami Herbert Business School Coral Gables Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo provide a research agenda and recommendations to address inequities in access to health care.Data Sources and Study SettingThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) organized a Health Equity Summit in July 2022 to evaluate what equity in access to health care means in the context of AHRQ's mission and health care delivery implementation portfolio. The findings are a result of this Summit, and subsequent convenings of experts on access and equity from academia, industry, and the government.Study DesignMulti‐stakeholder input from AHRQ's Health Equity Summit, author consensus on a framework and key knowledge gaps, and summary of evidence from the supporting literature in the context of the framework ensure comprehensive recommendations.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsThrough a stakeholder‐engaged process, themes were developed to conceptualize access with a lens toward health equity. A working group researched the most appropriate framework for access to care to classify limitations identified during the Summit and develop recommendations supported by research in the context of the framework. This strategy was intentional, as the literature on inequities in access to care may itself be biased.Principal FindingsThe Levesque et al. framework, which incorporates multiple dimensions of access (approachability, acceptability, availability, accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness), is the backdrop for framing research priorities for AHRQ. However, addressing inequities in access cannot be done without considering the roles of racism and intersectionality. Recommendations include funding research that not only measures racism within health care but also tests burgeoning anti‐racist practices (e.g., co‐production, provider training, holistic review, discrimination reporting, etc.), acting as a convener and thought leader in synthesizing best practices to mitigate racism, and forging the path forward for research on equity and access.ConclusionsAHRQ is well‐positioned to develop an action plan, strategically fund it, and convene stakeholders across the health care spectrum to employ these recommendations.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3