Affiliation:
1. Department of Academic Internal Medicine University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
2. Verily, Inc. South San Francisco California USA
3. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
4. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Mongan Institute Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
5. Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA
6. Department of Health Management and Policy Miami Herbert Business School Coral Gables Florida USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo provide a research agenda and recommendations to address inequities in access to health care.Data Sources and Study SettingThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) organized a Health Equity Summit in July 2022 to evaluate what equity in access to health care means in the context of AHRQ's mission and health care delivery implementation portfolio. The findings are a result of this Summit, and subsequent convenings of experts on access and equity from academia, industry, and the government.Study DesignMulti‐stakeholder input from AHRQ's Health Equity Summit, author consensus on a framework and key knowledge gaps, and summary of evidence from the supporting literature in the context of the framework ensure comprehensive recommendations.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsThrough a stakeholder‐engaged process, themes were developed to conceptualize access with a lens toward health equity. A working group researched the most appropriate framework for access to care to classify limitations identified during the Summit and develop recommendations supported by research in the context of the framework. This strategy was intentional, as the literature on inequities in access to care may itself be biased.Principal FindingsThe Levesque et al. framework, which incorporates multiple dimensions of access (approachability, acceptability, availability, accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness), is the backdrop for framing research priorities for AHRQ. However, addressing inequities in access cannot be done without considering the roles of racism and intersectionality. Recommendations include funding research that not only measures racism within health care but also tests burgeoning anti‐racist practices (e.g., co‐production, provider training, holistic review, discrimination reporting, etc.), acting as a convener and thought leader in synthesizing best practices to mitigate racism, and forging the path forward for research on equity and access.ConclusionsAHRQ is well‐positioned to develop an action plan, strategically fund it, and convene stakeholders across the health care spectrum to employ these recommendations.
Funder
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献