A comparison of retrospectively reported and ecological momentary assessment‐reported perceived social support in predicting ecological momentary assessment‐reported non‐suicidal self‐injury

Author:

Christensen Kirsten1ORCID,Victor Sarah E.1,Littlefield Andrew K.1,Mitchell Sean M.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological Sciences Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionNon‐suicidal self‐injury (NSSI) urges and behaviors are associated with lower perceived social support and related constructs (e.g., perceived rejection). However, no studies have examined the concordance of retrospective (baseline) and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) perceived social support assessments. Retrospective and EMA reports are often only weakly to moderately correlated; measurement approaches may, therefore, impact observed associations between variables. We tested whether average EMA‐reported perceived emotional social support uniquely predicts EMA‐reported NSSI urges and behaviors above baseline‐reported retrospective self‐report of perceived emotional social support alone.Methods93 young adults (ages 18–34) with past‐month NSSI urges or behaviors and lifetime NSSI behaviors completed a semi‐structured interview, self‐report surveys, and a 2‐week EMA protocol.ResultsBaseline‐ and EMA‐reported perceived emotional social support were positively correlated (Kendall's tau‐b = 0.51). Average EMA‐reported social support was uniquely associated with EMA‐reported NSSI urges but not NSSI behaviors.ConclusionsEMA‐reported perceived emotional social support captured information not represented by baseline reports alone, but improvement in model fit was modest. EMA‐reported social support may further improve the estimation of EMA‐reported NSSI urges if modeled as a proximal predictor of NSSI. Further work is needed to clarify temporal directions between social support and NSSI urges. Limitations are discussed.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3