The Measurement and Interpretation of Urethral Pressures Obtained by the Method of Brown and Wickham

Author:

ABRAMS P. H.,MARTIN S.,GRIFFITHS D. J.

Abstract

Summary— The most significant error in routine measurement of urethral pressure by the Brown‐Wickham method is caused by the slow response of the system to increasing pressure. Errors due to viscous pressure losses in the measuring catheter and to variable orientation of the catheter sideholes are not normally important.The distensibility of the urethra may be estimated from the variation of the measured pressure with infusion flow rate in the range above 2 ml/min.In highly distensible urethras the pressure actually measured is similar to the true pressure in the undistended urethra, but in less distensible urethras this is not so.Substantial leakage, at a flow rate of 2 ml/min or more, begins to occur when the intravesical pressure is approximately equal to the maximum pressure in the undistended urethra. Therefore, in highly distensible urethras the maximum measured pressure is a satisfactory guide to the intravesical pressure needed for substantial leakage. In less distensible urethras, however, substantial leakage may occur when the intravesical pressure is perhaps 25 cm H2O below the maximum pressure measured in the urethra.Leakage at very low flow rates may be possible through some urethras when the intravesical pressure is very low indeed. The urethral closure pressure profile, as ordinarily measured, is not a reliable guide to the possibility of such leakage.With care, the method of Brown and Wickham gives satisfactory measurements of the urethral closure pressure profile. However, the maximum profile pressure exceeds, sometimes by a considerable amount, the bladder pressure needed to cause leakage.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 55 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3