Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA
2. Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine Houston Methodist Research Institute Houston Texas USA
3. Academic Institute Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA
4. Department of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA
5. Department of Sociology and Criminology Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA
6. SSM Health Saint Louis University Transplant Center St. Louis University St. Louis Missouri USA
7. Department of Medical Social Sciences Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
8. J. C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center Houston Methodist Hospital Houston Texas USA
9. University of Iowa Organ Transplant Center University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA
10. Renal and Pancreas Transplant Division Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center RWJ Barnabas Health Livingston New Jersey USA
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundLiving donor kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end‐stage kidney disease; however, few living donor candidates (LDCs) who begin evaluation actually donate. While some LDCs are deemed medically ineligible, others discontinue for potentially modifiable reasons.MethodsAt five transplant centers, we conducted a prospective cohort study measuring LDCs’ clinical and psychosocial characteristics, educational preparation, readiness to donate, and social determinants of health. We followed LDCs for 12 months after evaluation to determine whether they donated a kidney, opted to discontinue, had modifiable reasons for discontinuing, were medically ineligible, or had other recipient‐related reasons for discontinuing.ResultsAmong 2184 LDCs, 18.6% donated, 38.2% opted to or had modifiable reasons for discontinuing, and 43.2% were deemed ineligible due to medical or recipient‐related reasons. Multivariable analyses comparing successful LDCs with those who did not complete donation for modifiable reasons (N = 1241) found that LDCs who discussed donation with the recipient before evaluation (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.54–3.46), had completed high school (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21–3.35), or were a “close relation” to their recipient (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.33–2.69) were more likely to donate. Conversely, LDCs who reported religion as important (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38–0.80), were Non‐White (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49–1.00), or had overall higher anxiety scores (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99) were less likely to donate.ConclusionWith fewer than a fifth of LDCs donating, developing programs to provide greater emotional support and facilitate open discussions between LDCs and recipients earlier may increase living donation rates.
Funder
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Burroughs Wellcome Fund