Gastric mucosal swab as an alternative to biopsy for Helicobacter pylori detection

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsGastric mucosal swab may be a more sensitive sampling method than a biopsy since Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) resides within the mucus layer. We compared the diagnostic performance of the rapid urease test (RUT) and bacterial load of H. pylori between swabs and tissue biopsy.MethodsOverall, 276 RUTs (138 swab‐RUTs (S‐RUT) and 138 tissue‐RUTs (T‐RUT)) were performed. To diagnose H. pylori infection, RUT, H. pylori PCR, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing of tissue and swab were used, and its infection was defined as at least two positives of the six test results. The diagnostic performances of RUTs and the H. pylori bacterial load using qPCR were compared between swab and biopsy.ResultsThe positivity rates of S‐RUT and T‐RUT were 35.5% (49/138) and 25.4% (35/138), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of S‐RUT were 98.0%, 100.0%, and 99.2%, while those of T‐RUT were 70.0%, 100%, and 89.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher for S‐RUT than for T‐RUT (p < 0.05). In the patients with atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, S‐RUT showed significantly higher sensitivity than T‐RUT. qPCR showed that the swab contained a significantly higher H. pylori bacterial load than tissue biopsy (22.92‐fold and 31.61‐fold in the antrum and body (p < 0.05), respectively).ConclusionsGastric mucosal swabs showed higher RUT accuracy and H. pylori bacterial load than a tissue biopsy. This may be an alternative to a biopsy when diagnosing H. pylori infection during endoscopy is necessary. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05349578).