Prospective memory in early and established psychosis: An Indian perspective

Author:

Rao Pulijala Sulakshana12ORCID,Rangaswamy Madhavi1,Evans Jonathan13,Dutt Anirban124

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Christ University Bangalore Karnataka 560029 India

2. Duttanagar Mental Health Centre Kolkata 700077 India

3. Institute of Health and Wellbeing University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

4. Department of Psychosis Studies Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractIndividuals affected by psychosis often have deficits in several neurocognitive functions. Prospective memory (PM), the ability to remember to do things, is crucial for activities of daily living, social and occupational functioning, but very few studies have attempted to examine this domain of functioning in people with psychosis, particularly in India. A total of 71 patients with psychosis, (both early and established psychosis), and 140 age, gender and education‐matched healthy controls were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination. PM was assessed using the Cambridge Prospective Memory Test and the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ). Group differences were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U‐tests. Significantly greater cognitive deficits, higher anxiety and depression were evident in the psychosis group compared with controls. The psychosis group performed significantly poorer on both time‐ and event‐based tests in CAMPROMPT than controls. These differences remained when controlling for age, education, general cognitive functioning and mood. The subjective measure of PM (PRMQ) did not differentiate the two groups. The PM performance of early and established psychosis patients was similar. Comparisons with cross‐cultural data (PRMQ UK norms and CAMPROMPT and PRMQ Chinese data) revealed important differences in PM performance. Individuals with psychosis have significant deficits in both time‐ and event‐based PM. CAMPROMPT emerged as a more sensitive PM measure compared with PRMQ. Results from cross‐cultural comparisons underscore the need for cultural contextualization of assessments.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3