Evaluation of the i‐gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study*

Author:

Werner Jakub12,Klementova Olga3,Bruthans Jan4,Macoun Jaromir4,Gaszynski Tomasz5,Henlin Tomas6,Donaldson Will7,Lichnovsky Erik8,Arava Shiva8,Lopez Ana M9,Berge Raquel9,Michalek Pavel4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Medicine University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

2. Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University Prague Czech Republic

5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland

6. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Medicine Military University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

7. Department of Anaesthesia Antrim Area Hospital Antrim UK

8. Department of Anaesthesia Craigavon Area Hospital Portadown UK

9. Department of Anaesthesia Hospital Clinic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe i‐gel® Plus is a modified version of the i‐gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice.MethodsThis international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i‐gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported.ResultsIn total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first‐attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first‐attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first‐attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients.ConclusionsThe i‐gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.

Funder

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3