Comparing Long‐Term Infliximab Persistence Following a Switch to a Biosimilar in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: No Cause for Concern

Author:

Suo Paulina12,Srinivasan Ashish34,Thin Lena56,An Yoon‐Kyo78,Fernandes Richard G.78,Ghaly Simon129,Jeffrey Angus W.610,Menon Shankar10,Olsen Nicholas11,Skinner Thomas12ORCID,van Langenberg Daniel R.34ORCID,Winston James3,Haifer Craig12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia

2. School of Clinical Medicine University of New South Wales New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Gastroenterology Eastern Health Melbourne Australia

4. Eastern Health Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia

5. Department of Gastroenterology Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Australia

6. Department of Medicine University of Western Australia Perth Australia

7. Department of Gastroenterology Mater Hospital Brisbane Australia

8. Mater Research Institute The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia

9. Department of Gastroenterology St Vincent's Private Hospital Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia

10. Department of Gastroenterology Royal Perth Hospital Perth Australia

11. Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionSeveral studies have demonstrated that switching stable patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from originator to biosimilar infliximab is noninferior to continuing originator infliximab. However, “real‐world” data comparing long‐term outcomes between switch and nonswitch cohorts is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing long‐term outcomes in IBD patients across switch and nonswitch cohorts.MethodsThe SAME study was a multicenter, prospective parallel cohort noninferiority study, that enrolled Australian IBD patients in steroid‐free clinical remission on maintenance originator infliximab, who either continued originator infliximab (n = 141) or switched to biosimilar (CT‐P13) infliximab (n = 204). Here, we present long‐term outcomes, with treatment persistence beyond 48 weeks as the primary outcome. Disease worsening, defined as any of infliximab discontinuation, dose escalation, antibody development, or adverse event, were secondary outcomes of interest.ResultsOf 345 patients enrolled in the SAME study, 320 (92.7%) patients were followed up beyond 48 weeks (median: 54.2 months [IQR 46.1–59.3]). There were no differences in infliximab discontinuation between switch and nonswitch cohorts (35.3% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.47). Infliximab discontinuation due to disease worsening (21.7% vs. 23.6%), dose escalation (35.2% vs. 32.4%), antibody development (5.3% vs. 11.3%), and infliximab‐related adverse events (7.8% vs. 8.3%), were also comparable (all p > 0.70) between switch and nonswitch cohorts.ConclusionsLong‐term infliximab persistence was similar between switch and nonswitch cohorts over 4 years of follow‐up. These data represent the longest duration of “real‐world” follow‐up, and should provide further reassurance that nonmedical switching is safe and clinically comparable to ongoing originator infliximab in clinically stable patients with IBD.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3