In vitro efficacy of non‐surgical and surgical implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations in the presence or absence of a suprastructure

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAnalysis of the in vitro efficacy of non‐surgical and surgical dental implant surface decontamination with or without suprastructure.Materials and MethodsThree hundred and sixty implants were dipped in indelible red and distributed to 30°, 60°, or 90° angulated bone defect models. One hundred and twenty implants were used for each bone defect, 40 of which were assigned to a decontamination method (CUR: curette; SOSC: soundscaler; APA: air powder abrasion). Of these, 20 were subjected to a simulated non‐surgical (NST) or surgical treatment (ST), with/without mucosa mask, of which 10 were carried out with (S+) or without (S−) suprastructure. Uncleaned implant surface was assessed by both‐sided implant surface photography. Surface morphology changes were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultsCleaning efficacy was significantly better within NST if the suprastructure was removed (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found within ST (p = 0.304). Overall, cleaning efficacy in the order APA > SOSC>CUR decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) for both S+ and S− in NST as well as ST. Separated by NST/ST, S+/S−, defect angulation and decontamination method, only isolated significant differences in cleaning efficacy were present. Linear regression analysis revealed significant associations of remnants with the treatment approach, decontamination method, and defect angle (p < 0.0001). SEM micrographs showed serious surface damage after use of CUR and SOSC.ConclusionsSuprastructure removal is an additional option to improve cleaning efficacy of non‐surgical implant surface decontamination in this in vitro model.