A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the efficacy of sleep interventions to treat suicidal ideation

Author:

Mournet Annabelle M.1ORCID,Kleiman Evan M.1

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA

Abstract

SummaryResearchers at the intersection of sleep and suicide research have advocated for investigation of sleep disturbances as a therapeutic target for the purposes of treating and preventing suicide. This study aims to provide the first systematic review and meta‐analysis on the efficacy of sleep interventions to treat suicidal ideation. This systematic review and meta‐analysis, registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, was conducted in PsycINFO, through Ovid. A sample of eight articles were deemed eligible and a total of 21 effect sizes were included. Egger's test suggested that no publication bias was present (b = 0.3695; p = 0.0852). The pooled effect size for sleep treatments on suicidal ideation was small (g = −0.0931, p = 0.3047). Significant heterogeneity was present (I2 = 44.13%), indicating the need for moderator analyses. Treatment type (medication versus psychotherapy; g = −0.2487, p = 0.3368), sex (g = −0.0007; p = 0.9263), and race (g = −0.0081; p = 0.1624) were all considered as moderators and were all found to be insignificant. This meta‐analysis revealed that initial studies exploring the efficacy of sleep interventions on suicidal ideation demonstrate small effect sizes. Despite this, the handful of studies included in this review nonetheless highlight this as an important area for continued exploration. The use of larger and more diverse samples, as well as intentionally designing sleep‐related interventions to improve ideation and behaviour, have the potential to enhance the efficacy of sleep interventions for this novel purpose.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3