Healing rates and outcomes following closed transmetatarsal amputations: A systematic review and random effects meta‐analysis of proportions

Author:

Coye Tyler1ORCID,Ansert Elizabeth2,Suludere Mehmet A.2ORCID,Chung Jayer1,Kang Gu Eon3ORCID,Lavery Lawrence A.4

Affiliation:

1. Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

2. Department of Plastic Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

3. Department of Bioengineering The University of Texas Dallas Texas USA

4. Department of Plastic Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractTransmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is a common surgical procedure for addressing severe forefoot pathologies, such as peripheral vascular disease and diabetic foot infections. Variability in research methodologies and findings within the existing literature has hindered a comprehensive understanding of healing rates and complications following TMA. This meta‐analysis and systematic review aims to consolidate available evidence, synthesising data from multiple studies to assess healing rates and complications associated with closed TMA procedures. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles published from January 1st, 1988, to June 1st, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised studies reporting healing rates in non‐traumatic transmetatarsal amputation patients with more than 10 participants, excluding open TMAs. Two independent reviewers selected relevant studies, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extracted from eligible studies included patient demographics, healing rates, complications, and study quality. Among 22 studies encompassing 1569 transmetatarsal amputations, the pooled healing rate was 67.3%. Major amputation rates ranged from 0% to 55.6%, with a random‐effects pooled rate of 23.9%. Revision rates varied from 0% to 36.4%, resulting in a pooled rate of 14.8%. 30‐day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%, with a fixed‐effects pooled rate of 2.6%. Post‐operative infection rates ranged from 3.0% to 30.7%, yielding a random‐effects pooled rate of 16.7%. Dehiscence rates ranged from 1.7% to 60.0%, resulting in a random‐effects pooled rate of 28.8%. Future studies should aim for standardised reporting and assess the physiological and treatment factors influencing healing and complications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Surgery

Reference42 articles.

1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher D;Open Med,2009

2. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

3. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias;Begg CB;Biometrics,1994

4. Limb salvage with transmetatarsal amputation;Efird WG;J Tenn Med Assoc,1989

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3