Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process

Author:

McCormick Ian1ORCID,Tong Kelvin12,Abdullah Nurliyana34ORCID,Abesamis‐Dischoso Carmen5,Gende Theresa67,Hashim Effendy Bin89ORCID,Ho S. May10,Jalbert Isabelle11ORCID,Jeronimo Belmerio12,Matoto‐Raikabakaba Elenoa13,Ono Koichi14,Piyasena Prabhath Nishantha1516,Rogers Jaymie T.17,Szetu John18,Tran Minh Anh19,Tse Dennis Yan‐yin20ORCID,Win Ye21,Yap Tiong Peng22ORCID,Yoon Sangchul23,Yusufu Mayinuer2425,Burton Matthew J.126ORCID,Ramke Jacqueline117ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. International Centre for Eye Health London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK

2. Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Pok Fu Lam Hong Kong

3. PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences Universiti Brunei Darussalam Bandar Seri Begawan Brunei Darussalam

4. Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, The John Curtin School of Medical Research Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

5. The Professional ODs Society Pasig Philippines

6. Divine Word University Madang Papua New Guinea

7. The Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand Madang Papua New Guinea

8. Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

9. Ministry of Health Putrajaya Malaysia

10. The Fred Hollows Foundation Melbourne Victoria Australia

11. School of Optometry and Vision Science UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

12. Department of Ophthalmology Guido Valadares National Hospital Dili Timor‐Leste

13. Colonial War Memorial Hospital Suva Fiji

14. Department of Ophthalmology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan

15. Directorate of Policy Analysis and Development Ministry of Health Colombo Sri Lanka

16. Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK

17. School of Optometry and Vision Science University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

18. The Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand Regional Eye Centre Honiara Solomon Islands

19. Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry Hanoi Medical University Hanoi Vietnam

20. School of Optometry The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong China

21. Sight for All Yangon Myanmar

22. IGARD Vision Therapy Centre Singapore City Singapore

23. Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine Yonsei University Seoul South Korea

24. Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology) The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

25. Centre for Eye Research Australia Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital East Melbourne Victoria Australia

26. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology London UK

Abstract

AbstractPurposeUncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub‐regions within the Western Pacific.MethodsWe invited eye care professionals to complete a two‐round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub‐region.ResultsSeventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub‐regions, reducing out‐of‐pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas.ConclusionThese results provide policy‐makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context‐specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector‐dominated models of care.

Funder

Roche

Wellcome Trust

Indigo Trust

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3