Affiliation:
1. Department of Laser Cosmetology The Sixth People's Hospital of Dongguan Dongguan Guangdong China
2. Department of Dermatology The Sixth People's Hospital of Dongguan City Dongguan Guangdong Province China
3. Department of Plastic and Cosmetology The Sixth People's Hospital of Dongguan City Dongguan Guangdong Province China
4. Department of General Medicine Affiliated Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundTranexamic acid (TA) is a new and promising drug for the treatment of melasma.ObjectivesThis network meta‐analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of various ways of administration of TA on melasma.MethodsWe collected researches from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Melasma area severity index (MASI) is used to evaluate the severity of melasma. After treatment with different TA administration methods, a difference in MASI is named ΔMASI. We evaluate the curative effect by comparing the ΔMASI of different TA administration methods at a certain time point.ResultsAt the Weeks 4, 8, and 12 and the last follow‐up, the ΔMASI of oral TA combined with routine topical agents (oTA + RTA) was higher than that of intradermal TA (iTA), topical TA (tTA) as well as microneedling TA (MNsTA), with statistical significance. At the 8th week, the ΔMASI of oTA was higher than that of iTA, with statistical significance. Compared with placebo, oTA showed statistically significant differences at Week 4, while tTA, iTA, and MNsTA showed statistically significant differences starting from Week 8.ConclusionsAmong various ways of administration of TA, oTA + RTA has the best effect on melasma. In the short term, the curative effect of oTA is better than that of iTA, and the onset time of oTA is faster than that of tTA, iTA and MNsTA. In the long run, the curative effect of TA alone has nothing to do with the mode of administration.