People living with HIV who inject or have injected non‐prescription drugs: Evidence of substantial differences in health inequalities and experiences of clinical care

Author:

Norman Thomas1ORCID,Power Jennifer1ORCID,Clifton Brent2,Murray Joel2ORCID,Bourne Adam13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society La Trobe University Melbourne Australia

2. National Association of People with HIV Australia Sydney Australia

3. Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThis study investigates differences in health and well‐being associated with current, past or no injecting drug use (IDU) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Australia, identifying key health care considerations between injecting experiences.MethodsData were extracted from the HIV Futures 9 study; a survey of PLHIV conducted in 2018–2019. Chi‐square and analysis of variance analyses compared clinical and treatment characteristics, major physical and mental comorbidities, sexually transmitted infection diagnoses, and quality of life for those who reported current (last 12 months), past (12+ months ago) or no IDU.ResultsCurrent IDU (n = 106) was associated with higher rates of sexually transmitted infection testing and diagnoses, higher frequency of self‐reported antiretroviral therapy non‐adherence due to drug use and greater social quality of life than past (n = 126) or no IDU (n = 508; total N = 740). Past and current IDUs were associated with more mental illness diagnoses and self‐reported concern about drug use. Past IDU was associated with more physical comorbidities, lower satisfaction with clinical care and greater difficulty in affording health care than current or no IDU.Discussion and ConclusionsPast and current IDUs are associated with unique health concerns. However, past IDU appears to be related to greater dissatisfaction in navigating health care than individuals with current IDU experience. Higher social connection and the types of services being accessed by individuals who currently inject may play a role in shaping service satisfaction. Peer‐based interventions to help support individuals in accessing services that are affirming of their needs is an ongoing priority.

Funder

Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3