Looking beyond marital status: What we can learn from relationship status measures

Author:

Compton D'Lane1ORCID,Kaufman Gayle2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology University of New Orleans New Orleans Louisiana USA

2. Department of Sociology Davidson College Davidson North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveWith needed and growing attention to sexual minorities and unmarried individuals, there is a need to consider how best to capture relationships and relationship organization in family studies.BackgroundTraditional measures of marital status are commonly used to examine differences in relationships and socioeconomic outcomes, but they do not adequately capture the diversity of relationship experiences and leave certain types of relationship experiences invisible.MethodThis article examines the inclusion of a relationship measure in the American Marriage Survey, a national probability‐based sample of 2806 adults in the United States, to provide a more diverse and expansive perspective on relationships and relationship organization. While there is a great deal of overlap between those who are married or cohabiting (marital status) and those who are in an exclusive relationship (relationship status), there is also potential for variation in what kinds of relationships, if any, people are in.ResultsWe find that the relationship measure is particularly useful in showing that a majority of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and pansexual individuals are in an exclusive relationship and also that gender and sexual minorities are more likely than cisgender and heterosexual individuals to be in consensual nonmonogamous relationships. This article also provides direction on re‐coding open text responses from the relationship status measure.ConclusionWe conclude that a relationship status measure allows for greater inclusivity and visibility of sexual minorities and unmarried persons, including but not limited to queer individuals, families, and communities, as well as consensual nonmonogamous relationships.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference54 articles.

1. Anderson L. Washington C. Kreider R. M. &Gryn T.(2023).Share of one‐person households more than tripled from 1940–2020. U.S. Census Bureau.www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/06/more-than-a-quarter-all-households-have-one-person.html

2. Badgett M. V. L. Goldberg N. Conron K. J. &Gates G. J.(2009).Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys (SMART). Williams Institute. www.williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/smart-so-survey/

3. Doing Sexuality: How Married Bisexual, Queer, and Pansexual People Navigate Passing and Erasure

4. The Marrying Kind?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3