Values and preferences of health care professionals, policy‐makers, patients and family members regarding recommendations of adapted physical restraint guidelines in critical care: A survey research

Author:

Cui Nianqi12ORCID,Gan Xiuni3,Huang Sufang4,Chu Zhe5,Chen Dandan6,Zhang Yuping1,Lan Meijuan1,Jin Jingfen178

Affiliation:

1. Nursing Department The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (SAHZU) Hangzhou China

2. School of Nursing Kunming Medical University Kunming China

3. Department of Nursing The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

5. Department of Emergency Medicine The First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun China

6. Faculty of Nursing Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou China

7. Key Laboratory of The Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Trauma and Burn of Zhejiang Province Hangzhou China

8. Changxing Branch Hospital of SAHZU Huzhou China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe values and preferences of stakeholders are crucial in the development of guidelines.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate stakeholders’ values and preferences regarding draft recommendations for adapted physical restraint guidelines in China.Study designThis survey research was carried out at four university‐affiliated comprehensive hospitals based in the eastern, central, western, and north eastern zones of China from January 5‐30, 2022. A 48‐item self‐report questionnaire was distributed, and values and preferences were assessed on a 10‐point Likert scale. One‐way ANOVA was used to compare values and preference scores among stakeholders. As effect‐size measures, partial η2 and Cohen's f values are reported for ANOVA results.ResultsA total of 1155 stakeholders were enrolled in the study. The mean value and preference scores were higher than seven for 46 draft recommendations. There was either no significant difference in the values and preferences of the stakeholders for the draft recommendations or there was a significant difference (p values ranged from <0.001 ∼ .048), but the effect size was small or very small (partial η2 value ranged from 0.011 ∼ .044; Cohen's f value ranged from 0.101 ∼ .214). The mean scores of patients for items related to cyber therapy and early tracheotomy were 6.84 and 6.60, respectively, which were lower than those of family members, policy‐makers, and health care professionals and were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The partial η2 and Cohen's f values of the effect size were 0.083/0.062 and 0.302/0.256, respectively, which indicated that the differences were moderate.ConclusionThese recommendations were in line with the values and preferences of stakeholders. Patients were more supportive of implementing cyber therapy or hypnosis for pain management but did not support early tracheotomy to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. Guideline panels could use value and preference information to revise and endorse recommendations of adapted physical restraint guidelines in critical care.Relevance to Clinical PracticePractitioners should implement recommendations based on the values and preferences of stakeholders.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Critical Care Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3