Comparison of different risk stratifications for gastric cancer and establishing a simplified risk‐scoring model based on the Kyoto classification

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimThe study aims to assess the value of different risk stratifications in diagnosing early gastric cancer (GC) and explore risk factors based on Kyoto gastritis classification.MethodsThis study was a single‐centered cross‐sectional study; all epidemiological data and endoscopic findings were obtained prospectively. To evaluate the proportion of GC in each risk stratification and to compare the diagnostic performance of different methods using the receiver operating characteristic curve, univariable and multivariable analyses were used to explore the correlation between endoscopic findings and GC.ResultsA total of 240 subjects were enrolled, and the diagnostic efficacy of the Kyoto Classification Score was similar to Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) stage, and the accuracy was higher than that of the Japanese scoring system and OLGA stage. Moderate atrophy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52–8.16), severe atrophy (OR = 4.96, 95% CI: 1.75–14.04), map‐like redness (OR = 9.89, 95% CI: 1.16–84.15), and xanthelasma (OR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.15–11.15) were independent risk factors for GC. The simplified Kyoto classification (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.76, P = 0.58) based on multivariable analysis demonstrated favorable diagnostic value compared with traditional Kyoto classification score (AUROC = 0.74).ConclusionsThis study confirms the value of the Kyoto classification score and the OLGIM stage in the risk stratification of GC. Simplified Kyoto classification is also promising in risk assessment of GC but still requires validation in the population.