Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomies: a systematic review

Author:

Siragusa Leandro1ORCID,Pellino Gianluca23ORCID,Sensi Bruno1ORCID,Panis Yves4,Bellato Vittoria1ORCID,Khan Jim5,Sica Giuseppe S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Sciences Università degli studi di Roma ‘Tor Vergata’ Rome Italy

2. Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Naples Italy

3. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB Barcelona Spain

4. Colorectal Surgery Center Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré‐Hartmann Neuilly sur Seine France

5. Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK

Abstract

AbstractAimAmbulatory laparoscopic colectomy (ALC), meaning discharge within 24 h of surgical colonic resection, has recently been proposed in a few, selected patients. This systematic review was performed with the aim of reviewing protocols for ALC and assessing feasibility, safety and outcomes after ALC.MethodA PRISMA‐compliant systematic review and pooled analysis was performed searching all English studies published until October 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (PROSPERO, CRD42022334463). Inclusion criteria were original articles including patients undergoing ALC, specifying at least one outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were articles reporting a robotic‐assisted procedure; unable to retrieve patient data from articles; the same patient series included in different studies. Primary outcomes were success, overall complications and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included mortality and specific complications such us surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, bleeding, rate of ALC acceptance, and unscheduled consultation and reoperation rate.ResultsAmong 1087 studies imported for screening, 11 were included (1296 patients). The success rate was 47% with an overall morbidity of 14%. Readmission and reoperation rates were 5% and 1%, respectively. No mortality was recorded. Protocols of ALC differ significantly among published studies.ConclusionsOverall, ALC appears to be safe and feasible in selected cases with an acceptable success rate and a low risk of readmission after hospital discharge. Future studies should evaluate patients' benefits and discharge criteria, as well as uniformity and standardization of eligibility criteria. This systematic review may help inform on ALC adoption in clinical practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Short-Stay Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Is It Safe?;Journal of the American College of Surgeons;2023-11-08

2. Same-day discharge bariatric surgery: A pilot experience from an Italian center;Il Giornale di Chirurgia - Journal of the Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons;2023-09-13

3. Enhanced recovery and earlier discharge after colorectal resections – still evolving?;Colorectal Disease;2023-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3