Standardized prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates following initial non‐malignant biopsy result

Author:

Stroomberg Hein V.12ORCID,Andersen Marc C.M.1,Helgstrand John Thomas1ORCID,Larsen Signe Benzon13,Vickers Andrew J.4ORCID,Brasso Klaus15,Røder Andreas15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

3. Survivorship and Inequality in Cancer Danish Cancer Society Research Centre Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA

5. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare the incidence of subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis and death following an initial non‐malignant systematic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy with that in an age‐ and calendar‐year matched population over a 20‐year period.Subjects and MethodsThis population‐based analysis compared a cohort of all men with initial non‐malignant TRUS biopsy in Denmark between 1995 and 2016 (N = 37 231) with the Danish population matched by age and calendar year, obtained from the NORDCAN 9.1 database. Age‐ and calendar year‐corrected standardized prostate cancer incidence (SIR) and prostate cancer‐specific mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated and heterogeneity among age groups was assessed with the Cochran's Q test.ResultsThe median time to censoring was 11 years, and 4434 men were followed for more than 15 years. The corrected SIR was 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1–5.4) and the corrected SMR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.81). Estimates differed among age groups (P < 0.001 for both), with a higher SIR and SMR among younger men.ConclusionMen with non‐malignant TRUS biopsy have a much higher incidence of prostate cancer but a risk of prostate cancer death below the population average. This underlines that the oncological risk of cancers missed in the initial TRUS biopsy is low. Accordingly, attempts to increase the sensitivity of initial biopsy are unjustified. Moreover, current follow‐up after non‐malignant biopsy is likely to be overaggressive, particularly in men over the age of 60 years.

Funder

Danish Cancer Society Research Center

Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Prostate Cancer Foundation

Sidney Kimmel Foundation for Cancer Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3