Hip Preservation or Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Case–Control Study of Factors Influencing Arthroplasty Decision‐Making for Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in China

Author:

Wei Wei1,Tan Biao23ORCID,Yan Yan1,Li Wenlong4ORCID,Zeng Xiangrong5,Chen Qianglong5,Wang Rongtian1,He Haijun3,Qin Ling67,Li Taixian1,Chen Weiheng1

Affiliation:

1. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing China

2. Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Chongqing China

3. Wangjing Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing China

4. Beijing Hepingli Hospital Beijing China

5. Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guiyang China

6. Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory Innovative Orthopaedic Biomaterial and Drug Translational Research Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

7. Translational Medicine R&D Center Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen China

Abstract

ObjectiveAt present, there is no consensus or guidance on indications for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) patients to receive hip arthroplasty (THA) treatment. This study aims to explore the factors that influence the decision‐making for THA in patients with ONFH, and to provide references for clinical decision for ONFH patients to be indicated for THA or hip preservation.MethodsThis retrospective case–control study involved data for ONFH patients from July 2016 to October 2021 from the China Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Database (CONFHD). The patients with ONFH, and unilateral hip affected at the first visit were divided into THA group and non‐THA group according to if they had undergone THA treatment. The differences between the two groups of patients in terms of gender, age at the time of consultation, body mass index (BMI), etiology, onset side, association research circulation osseous (ARCO) stage, hip joint function, visual analog scale (VAS), etc. were analyzed. Multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was then applied to evaluate the risk factors of ONFH patients who underwent THA during the first visit.ResultsA total of 640 patients were recruited for analysis, including 209 cases from the THA group and 431 cases from the non‐THA group. The results of univariate analysis showed that the two groups of patients were significantly different in the following six indicators: age (59 vs. 46, Z = −9.58, p < 0.001), duration of disease (78 vs. 17, Z = –16.14, p < 0.001), gender composition (χ2 = 8.09, p = 0.004), disease etiology (χ2 = 33.04, p < 0.001), ARCO stage (χ2 = 334.86, p < 0.001), flexion of hip joint (χ2 = 172.33, p < 0.001). However, the comparison between the two groups on VAS (Z = –0.82, p = 0.41), BMI (Z = –1.35, p = 0.18), and onset side (χ2 = 1.53, p = 0.22) did not obviously differ. The results regression analysis showed that the age at the time of consultation, duration of disease, ARCO stage, and the hip joint function affected the decision making if the patients should undergo THA. The results of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that aforementioned indicators were satisfactory in predicting whether patients with ONFH would be treated with THA. The regression model using the above four indicators as comprehensive indicators has satisfactory performance in predicting whether to perform THA, and the area under the curve (AUC) is 93.94%.ConclusionThese factors such as age, duration of disease, ARCO stage, and hip flexion function should be considered comprehensively before making decisions to perform THA or not in our clinical practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3